You are being blamed for the hypoxia dead zone, even though nitrogen (N) use has not increased since 1980.

The dead zone, which is said to be draining the life out of more than 8,000 sq. mi. of the Louisiana and Texas Gulf Coast, could cause use of N and phosphorus (P) to be regulated to prevent runoff and leaching — whether it's your fault or not.

“Unfortunately, farmers will continue to receive criticism,” says Don Parrish, environmental policy manager for American Farm Bureau Federation.

Science indicates that growers are handling N better and seeing higher yields despite cutting back on N applications.

Nevertheless, farmers receive the most criticism from environmental groups. A plan issued this summer by the EPA increases the reduction in N and P emissions into the Gulf of Mexico to 45% each, up from 30% in policy set in 2001.

The summer also saw environmental groups in nine states petition EPA to set and enforce pollution standards in the 31 states of the Mississippi River Basin.

The hypoxia zone, about the size of New Jersey and the second largest such area in the world, is threatening sea life because of N, P and other soil nutrients. These nutrients promote algal and attendant zooplankton growth.

Dead algal cells and other debris from the algae sink to the bottom, decomposing and consuming available oxygen.

Stratification of Mississippi and Atchafalaya (in east-central Louisiana) river waters, which make up 95% of the fresh water affecting the northern Gulf, prevents the mixing of oxygen-rich water on the surface with oxygen-depleted water on the bottom. The hypoxia shrinks in the winter and grows again the next spring, summer and early fall.

Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium (LUMCON), which heads Gulf Coast hypoxia monitoring, says the annual hypoxia emergence developed early in 2008 due to above-average Mississippi River discharge in February and major flooding in April.

University recommendations across the Corn Belt, and now many growers' actions, don't follow the old theory of 1.2 lbs. of N fertilization needed for 1 bu. of corn. According to recent N-rate trials, they don't need to apply that much N. “In Iowa, many have gone to maximum return to N approach,” says John Sawyer, Iowa State University Extension agronomist. (See “Rethinking Nitrogen” in January 2007 Corn & Soybean Digest, http://cornandsoybeandigest.com/mag/soybean_rethinking_nitrogen/index.html.)

“A statewide nutrient balance for Iowa indicates more N is now removed from the soil annually through harvested grain plus losses to air and water than is applied from all sources, including manure,” says Dean Lemke of the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship (IDALS).

“Nitrogen fertilizer rates have stayed relatively constant the past 25 years while corn yields have increased significantly — an indication that growers are doing a more efficient job of utilizing N.”

WHAT CAN YOU DO to reduce runoff or leaching? Sawyer says growers can likely manage their fertilizer even better, but can't prevent N runoff or leaching.

“It makes it very challenging,” says Sawyer. “Many growers are already doing a good job of managing their N use. “With use of the best practices known, nitrate will still move to surface water systems via groundwater recharge and tile drainage flow. There are also out-of-field practices that can help.”

Wetlands can help reduce nitrates through the process of denitrification and may help trap other nutrients, like P. “Growers can also use biofilters at the outlet of tiles to reduce the nitrate concentration in tile flow,” says Sawyer.

“Strategically located wetlands can remove 40-90% of the nitrates,” says Lemke. “Improving the capacity of tile lines will also reduce surface runoff, erosion and sediment and P discharged to streams.”

He and Sawyer agree that cover crops can also help remove N and P from the soil.

“We need to grow something on the landscape more than just between May and August,” says Lemke.

Sawyer says, “nitrification inhibitors can help, but will likely improve crop utilization and efficiency more than nitrate concentrations in surface waters.”

Urea can be coated for more timely release for crops. “This will be less helpful for nitrate reduction in surface waters,” says Sawyer.

Leaching, a major contributor to the nitrate-to-water problem, is difficult — if even possible — to control, especially with intensive row-crop production where there are no living plants in the late fall and early spring time period. “It's a process that goes on no matter what we do,” says Sawyer, because of water movement through soil and draining lands with tile systems. “Even if we don't apply N, N derived by mineralization from the soil organic material leaches out.

“Rate of N application is important for greatest agronomic and economic return, and for water quality,” Sawyer says.

BUT DON'T SINGLE out ag. “There's no doubt that agriculture has made significant contributions of nutrients (into the river system),” says Lemke. “So do cities, industries, communities and man's activities across the 31 states within the Mississippi River Basin.”

IDALS is part of an EPA task force that developed the 2008 Hypoxia Action Plan. It aims at reducing and controlling hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico and improving water quality in the Mississippi River Basin. (To see the plan, go to www.epa.gov/msbasin/taskforce/actionplan08.htm).