RFA on 2013 RFS Proposal: Program Working, But Imports a Concern

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released its long-awaited proposed rule for 2013 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) volumetric requirements. The proposal waives the cellulosic biofuel requirement from 1 billion gallons to 14 million gallons, but retains overall advanced biofuel and renewable fuel requirements. In response, Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) President and CEO Bob Dinneen offered the following comments.

“The 2013 RFS requirements will be the catalyst that finally compels oil companies to get serious about breaching the so-called blend wall. This year’s RFS requirements will necessitate the use of more E15, E85 and other higher-level blends. Injecting larger volumes of biofuels into the U.S. fuel supply and spurring a more rapid transition to domestically produced renewables is exactly what the RFS was intended to do. The program is working as envisioned by Congress.

“EPA again considered the best available information – including projections from the Energy Information Administration – to set the 2013 cellulosic biofuel requirement. The proposed standard in no way exaggerates the volumes that will be available in 2013 based on current information, and may ultimately prove to be conservative. Cellulosic ethanol is being produced today at commercial scale in Florida, and with construction nearing completion at several other commercial sites, we fully expect 2013 to be the breakthrough year for cellulosic ethanol. At the same time, the fact that EPA waived 98.6% of the statutory cellulosic biofuel standard demonstrates the extraordinary flexibility and adaptability of the RFS program.

“We are concerned, however, that the proposed 2013 advanced biofuel standard will open the door even wider to imports of more expensive Brazilian sugarcane ethanol. We hope the requirement can be met with domestic advanced biofuels, like waste-derived ethanol and biodiesel. However, we must be mindful that imports accounted for 92% of the 2012 advanced biofuel standard. In an unconstrained fuel market where E15 and other mid-level blends were broadly available, imports would not be a major concern. However, in today’s constrained market, where oil companies continue to throw up roadblocks to E15 and other mid-level blends, every gallon of imported ethanol is one less gallon of domestically produced ethanol that will be used. This occurs only because EPA allows more expensive imported Brazilian ethanol to claim the advanced biofuel RIN that is currently trading at 48¢. High-priced sugar ethanol imports began to cannibalize the U.S. market in 2012, and today’s decision potentially adds fuel to the fire.

“RFA will continue to encourage EPA to revisit its lifecycle analysis, which graciously assigns advanced biofuel status to sugarcane ethanol. EPA’s outdated analysis suggests sugarcane ethanol reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 52-71% relative to gasoline. However, the most recent peer-reviewed, published estimate found the range of sugarcane GHG reductions to be 40-62%, meaning nearly half of current sugarcane imports likely do not meet the 50% GHG reduction requirement.”

RFA will be filing comments in response to today’s proposal from EPA.

With regard to EPA's proposal to address biodiesel RIN fraud, Dinneen adds, “We're encouraged that EPA has proposed a voluntary mechanism for obligated parties to assure the RINs they are using for compliance actually reflect a gallon produced. It addresses a major concern oil companies have raised regarding biodiesel RINs and assures the overall integrity of the RFS program. It is important to note that there have been no incidents of RIN fraud with ethanol gallons produced for the RFS in large part because ethanol producers generally do not separate the RINs from the gallons they produced, as is the case with other biofuels.”

Discuss this Article 1

Harold Smith (not verified)
on Feb 1, 2013

Why would you publish a trade group's propaganda (RFA) as factual? Brazilian ethanol is approx 17 times more efficient to produce than corn ethanol because the feedstock is sugar and therefore in the long run its going to forever be cheaper even after shipping and the import tariff. Why is it OK for US corn ethanol producers to export over a billion gallons (like they did a few years ago) whenever there is an oversupply here in the US - I thought thought they were supposed to be offsetting foreign oil here? Then when somebody wants to import because there more efficient they whine and complain. The reality is that the economics of ethanol production from corn are irrational. And why on earth would we want to tie our food prices to fuel. The drought has proven to many that these ethanol producers and the corn lobby won't be satisfied until every arable acre is planted in corn and every person and animal is starved in this great nation. We need to repeal the corn ethanol component of the RFA immediately.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Corn and Soybean Digest ID
(optional)

Newsletter Signup

Continuing Education Courses
New Course

Accredited for 2 hours/CCA Soil & Water credits. The 2,000 member...

This online CE course details sound mechanical irrigation design and management practices to...
Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a...
Connect With Us