What's Driving the Surge in Ethanol Imports?

What is in this article?:

More About:

With ethanol production margins under pressure in recent months there has been an understandable search for explanations. One widely discussed factor is the recent surge in "cheap" imports of ethanol to the U.S. from Brazil. As the chart documents, the volume of ethanol imports to the U.S. definitely has risen notably in the in the last few months. Total imports during January-May 2012 totaled only 43 million gallons, but increased over five-fold to 235 million gallons over June-September. It is important to keep in mind that ethanol imports have actually been much larger in the past. The U.S. imported a total of 1.7 billion gallons of ethanol in 2006-2008, mainly due to an immediate need to replace MTBE as an oxygenate in our motor fuel gasoline supply.

It is easy to answer the question of where all the ethanol imports come from. The U.S. and Brazil produce about 90% of the ethanol in the world, so Brazil has been the source of virtually all ethanol imports to the U.S. (Official statistics show some imports coming from Caribbean countries but this is just the re-export of Brazilian ethanol through these countries for tariff and logistical reasons.) It is also easy to answer the question of when the ethanol imports occur. Brazilian ethanol is made from sugarcane and the cane harvest season is roughly from mid-June to mid-December, so the bulk of ethanol supplies for export to the U.S. are available in the second half of the calendar year.

The question of why such large quantities of ethanol imports have been coming to the U.S. from Brazil in recent months is not as simple, but there is an answer. First of all, the answer is NOT that Brazilian ethanol is cheap relative to U.S. produced ethanol, as many apparently believe. This can be disproved rather straightforwardly. The price of U.S. produced ethanol at Gulf terminals on Nov. 29, 2012 was $2.60/gal. On the same day, the price of (anhydrous) ethanol F.O.B. at the Brazilian port of Santos was $2.65/gal. Assuming freight costs are 20¢/gal., the landed cost of Brazilian ethanol to the U.S. Gulf was $2.85. No U.S. gasoline blender would have purchased Brazilian ethanol based on market economics because it would have resulted in a net loss of 25¢/gal. compared to purchasing U.S. produced ethanol at the same location.

Discuss this Article 5

Charlie Peters (not verified)
on Dec 8, 2012

Is CA using Brazil sugar ethanol at a premium of $0.16 per gallon so Valero is shipping GMO corn ethanol to Brazil? Is SHELL also moving on the CA natural gas electric market that the people pay at double the national rate? So is CA funding export of energy profit?

What would a California judge do with AB 118 Nunez/Arnold?

AAA said it would not pass a court test.

GMO Corn in my food and gas stinks.

Arnold ask the fed for a waiver and the Clinton EPA agreed

UN, World Bank, many Governors, Several Congressmen, Bill Clinton & Al Gore say (Mary Nichols) corn ethanol in the gas is bad policy.

Charlie Peters (not verified)
on Dec 8, 2012

Bill Clinton, Al Gore & Senator Obama supported the California 2006 Prop. 87, a GMO corn ethanol welfare program.

Bill, Al, have changed opinion on the ethanol mandate, I wonder if California will make this the time for CHANGE?

I support a waiver of the ethanol mandate, voluntary use of ethanol in my gas.

Federal ethanol policy increases Government motors oil use and Big oil profit.

It is reported that today California is using Brazil sugar cane ethanol at $0.16 per gal increase over using GMO corn fuel ethanol. In this game the cars and trucks get to pay and Big oil profits are the result that may be ready for change.

We do NOT support the ethanol mandate unless the ethanol mandate is changed to voluntary ethanol in our gas.

Folks that pay more at the pump for less from Cars, trucks, food, water & air need better, it is time.

The car tax of AB 118 Nunez is just a simple Big oil welfare program, AAA questioned the policy and some folks still agree.

stan
on Dec 9, 2012

Oh please stop the mandates,( it is UN American and unfair) and return American to a free market where the consumer can chose what they believe is the best way to make the world a better place to live.

We are not a bunch of dummies.

Prove to us ethanol is good, and we will buy it without you forcing it on us.

So again, END THE MANDATE PLEASE!

stan
on Dec 10, 2012

The problem I have with ethanol is the corn growers and Renewable Fuel lobbyist continue to force Americans to buy their product(with a mandate) with no freedom to chose what is best. And do not allow the free market work the way it should.
This is a UN American way to do business. If ethanol is a good product they do not need the mandate to sell it.
This unfair, UN American way of marketing really bothers me.

Charlie Peters (not verified)
on Dec 25, 2012

Audit the fed, support HR 459 Paul and S 202 Paul

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Corn and Soybean Digest ID
(optional)

Newsletter Signup

Continuing Education Courses
New Course

Accredited for 2 hours/CCA Soil & Water credits. The 2,000 member...

This online CE course details sound mechanical irrigation design and management practices to...
Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a...
Connect With Us