Corn Price Decline Less Than 1% With Full RFS Waiver

Summary of key findings

If EPA waived the RFS requirements for 2012-2013 (Sept. 1, 2012 to Aug. 31, 2013):

  • 2012-2013 corn use for ethanol would fall just 59 million bushels, or -1.3%.
  • 2012-2013 corn use for feed and residual would increase just 25 million bushels, or 0.6%.
  • 2012-2013 corn exports would increase just 10 million bushels, or 0.8%.
  • 2012-2013 ending stocks would increase 23 million bushels, or 3.1%
  • These demand shifts result in 2012-2013 corn prices falling from $7.87 to $7.83/bu., or -0.5%.
  • Retail pork prices would fall 1¢ from $3.59 to $3.58/lb., a -0.04% reduction.
  • Retail beef prices are $5.30/lb., with or without a waiver.

If EPA allowed RINs to continue to be generated during the waiver period and carried forward:

  • 2013-2014 corn use for ethanol would fall 354 million bushels, or -6.6%.
  • 2013-2014 corn use for feed would increase 112 million bushels, or 2.3%.
  • 2013-2014 corn exports would increase 54 million bushels, or 2.9%.
  • 2013-2014 corn ending stocks would increase 51 million bushels, or 3.3%.
  • These demand shifts would result in 2013-2014 corn prices falling from $5.22 to $5.05/bu., or -3.2%.

 

If RINs are not generated during the waiver period:

  • 2013-2014 corn use for ethanol would increase 88 million bushels, or 1.6%.
  • 2013-2014 corn use for feed would decrease 42 million bushels, or -0.8%.
  • 2013-2014 corn use for exports would fall 19 million bushels, or -1.0%.
  • 2013-2014 corn ending stocks would fall 15 million bushels, or -1.0%.
  • These demand shifts would result in 2013-2014 corn prices rising from $5.22 to $5.28/bu., or 1.1%.
  • Thus, under this scenario, waiving the RFS in 2012-2013 would lead to higher corn prices in 2013-2014.

Discuss this Article 4

D.DiTullio (not verified)
on Oct 8, 2012

As an advocate of biofuels especially ethanol (E10 in out tanks) I'd prefer RFS stay on track with implementation of E15 rather than going the waiver route. Keeping this nascent industry viable would (I believe) stimulate cellulosic ethanol production and this would over the long term decrease corn ethanol production over cellulosic ethanol production

D.DiTullio (not verified)
on Oct 8, 2012

As an advocate of biofuels especially ethanol (E10 in out tanks) I'd prefer RFS stay on track with implementation of E15 rather than going the waiver route. Keeping this nascent industry viable would (I believe) stimulate cellulosic ethanol production and this would over the long term decrease corn ethanol production over cellulosic ethanol production

Bobby Fontaine (not verified)
on Oct 8, 2012

not true at all, they are looking at supply and demand corn values while ignoring corn futures speculating,, the fact the government has required such an expanded use of corn to make ethanol tells speculators that corn prices can do nothing but go up,, commodities markets are meant to be uncertain and volatile,, they are designed to be used as hedges against losses, not speculating on sure things,, the RFS changes the market by pointing it in a government required upward direction, which has resulted in a great deal of the price of corn being propped up by gamblers rather than actual futures traders who are actually involved in corn production and use, or other commodities markets,, the RFS changes the whole commodity curricula as farmers move to corn to support ethanol production because there’s more money in it,, that means they move away from other crops creating shortages in them and driving up those costs as well,, this makes commodities markets far more transparent than they were designed to be,, if the RFS was dropped, prices would drop like a rock as speculators exit futures markets,, ands this is not rocket science so you really have to question who comes up with these studies,, it seems that when it comes to doing research on anything related to commodity markets, reporting on speculators is off limits,, I just don’t see how the news media can expect anyone to believe they are provided the service they claim when the real stories get filtered this way

bethanyjones
on Jan 18, 2013

Substances like bio-fuels are very important resource that is used by all in routine. So its conservation is must.

chemical
peels

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Corn and Soybean Digest ID
(optional)

Newsletter Signup

Continuing Education Courses
New Course

Accredited for 2 hours/CCA Soil & Water credits. The 2,000 member...

This online CE course details sound mechanical irrigation design and management practices to...
Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a...
Connect With Us