Beginning with the 2012 crop year, farmers purchasing crop insurance for corn and soybeans in 14 Midwestern states will have the option to use the Trend-Adjusted Actual Production History (TA-APH) Yield Endorsement. The TA-APH yield endorsement allows farmers to increase yields used in calculating crop insurance guarantees. The product concept submission to RMA was sponsored by the Illinois Corn Marketing Board, and developed in conjunction with faculty from the University of Illinois.
Rationale
Actual production history (APH) yields are used in the calculation of yield and revenue guarantees in the COMBO product. In the simplest case, the APH yield is based on a history of yields from the insured unit. To be based totally on historical yields, at least four years of yields must be provided. Up to 10 years of yields are used in the APH yield. When more than 10 yields exist from a farm, the most recent 10 are used in calculating the APH yield.
In crops with increasing yields over time, the APH yield lags the true “expected,” or most likely yield, for the coming insurance year. For example, consider a trend increase of 2 bu./year for corn, which has been the general rate increase of corn yields over much of Illinois. In other words, corn yields are increasing by a rate of 2 bu./year on average. If a farm has 10 years of continuous yields, the average of those 10 years will lag the expected yield by 11 bu. ((10 years of continuous yields / 2 + 0.5) x 2-bu. trend).
Because APH yields lag expected yields, guarantees will also lag. The TA-APH endorsement corrects this issue by allowing a trend adjustment to be added to the APH yield. The resulting TA-APH yield then is used in calculating guarantees.
Each county and crop has a TA-APH trend rate. This rate is estimated using National Agricultural Statistical Service (NASS) county yields, with controls include for weather and spatial considerations. These TA-APH rates are county specific and are published by the Risk Management Agency (RMA). Each insured unit in a county will use the same TA-APH rate. The table in the appendix shows corn and soybean TA-APH rates for Illinois.

Table 1 shows an example of the 2012 TA-APH yield calculation for a McLean County farm having 10 consecutive yields from 2002 through 2011. The 2002 yield is 158 bu./acre, the 2003 yield is 144 bu., the 2004 yield is 182 bu., and so on. This APH yield for this yield history is 175.4 bu.
Corn in McLean County has yield trend of 2.06 bu./year. Under the Trend-Adjusted APH, each yield will be adjusted by 2.06 bu. times the number of years from the current insurance year. The further the year is from the 2012 current year, the higher is the trend adjustment. For the 2011 yield, the trend adjustment is 2.06. In 2011, the actual yield is 170 bu., and the TA-APH yield is 172.1 bu. (172.06 = 170 bu. + 2.06 trend adjustment). The trend adjustment for the 2010 yield is 4.12 bu., or the 2.06 trend times two years from 2012. The actual yield in 2010 is 186 bu. and the TA-APH yield is 190.1 bu. (186 bu. plus 4.01 trend adjustment). The above process is continued for each year in the past, and then the adjusted yields averaged to arrive at the Trend-Adjusted APH.
In the example shown in Table 1, the TA APH yield is 186.73 bu., 11.33 bu. above the 175.4-bu. APH yield.
To be eligible for the APH yield, a farmer must:
1. Be located in a county where the TA-APH endorsement is offered
2. Have at least one actual yield in the last four years.
An actual yield is based on yields from a farm, not simply transitional yield (T-yield) which is a plugged value when actual yields do not exist, or other changes occur in the insured unit.
Other details include:
Summary
The vast majority of corn and soybean farmers will find the TA-APH yield endorsement an attractive option. The TA endorsement causes the yield used in guarantee calculation to more accurately reflect actual production. In addition, the TA-APH yield endorsement eliminates penalties for long yield histories, as yields in the past are updated to reflect current yields.
Read the article at farmdocdaily.com.